Gantry 5

TSXV:AGA | OTCQB:AAGAF | FRA:QP2

  • Corporate
      • Back
      • About Us
      • Our Team
      • Cautionary Statements
  • Projects
      • Back
      • Red Mountain Project
      • Adams Plateau Project
      • Michelle Project
  • Investors
      • Back
      • Silver 101
      • Share Structure
      • Presentation
      • Financial reports
      • AGM
  • News
      • Back
      • 2025
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
  • Contact
  • Sign Up
search-icon

smart seach

main subpage banner

 

Red Mountain Project - Alaska, USA

The Red Mountain Project represents a district-scale polymetallic opportunity with significant upside potential. The combination of high-grade mineralization, favorable jurisdiction and importantly State managed lands makes it an ideal candidate for development.

img1

The Red Mountain Project is Silver47's flagship asset, strategically located in Alaska, 100 kilometers south of Fairbanks. This project offers a unique opportunity to explore and develop high-grade silver, copper, and gold resources in a premier mining jurisdiction.

Location

Red Mountain is situated on Alaska state-managed lands, free from Bureau of Land Management (BLM) or indigenous claims, covering approximately 620 square kilometers of highly prospective stratigraphy with highways, railway, and power within 30-80km.

Ownership

Silver47 wholly owns 942 mineral claims and one mining lease, providing extensive exploration opportunities over a 60km trend in a mining-friendly region near infrastructure.

  • Alaska is host to several world class deposits and mines
img2

Highlights

bullet-icon

Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate

  • Combined open-pit and underground Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate of 15.6 million tonnes at 335.7 g/t AgEq*, containing:168.6 million ounces of Silver Equivalent (AgEq*)
    • Equivalent to 1 million tonnes of Zinc (ZnEq*) at 7%
bullet-icon

Significant Exploration Potential

    • Exploration target of 50-75 million tonnes at 300-400 g/t AgEq*, equivalent to 500-900 million ounces of AgEq*
    • Over 5,000 permitted drill sites with multiple untested geochemical and geophysical anomalies, indicating a high potential for new discoveries

The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and therefore is an approximation. There has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource beyond the stated resource in the January 2024 inferred estimate* above and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of an increase in Mineral Resource.  The potential quantity and grade has been determined from drill hole density analysis and the linear, consistent nature of VMS deposits

bullet-icon

Strategic Location

  • Located within 30-80 kilometers of highways, railways, and power, ensuring logistical efficiency and reduced development costs
  • Located amongst numerous multi million ounces VMS and SEDEX deposits

Red Mountain NI-43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate

NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate

Combined Open-Pit and Underground Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate
Mineral
Resource
Area
Rock
Mt
 Zn Eq kt  Zn Eq % AgEq
Moz
AgEq
g/t
Zn kt   Zn % Pb
kt 
Pb
%
Cu
kt
Cu
%
Ag
Moz 
Ag
g/t 
Au
Koz 
Au
g/t
Dry Creek  11.6  676  5.84  104.0  279.4  346  2.99  130  1.13  23  0.20  17.5  47  128  0.34
West Tundra Flats  4.0  420  10.39  64.6  496.9  186  4.60  86  2.13  3  0.08  18.4  141.2  86 0.66 
Global  15.6  1,097  7.02  168.6  335.7  532  3.41  216  1.39  26  0.17  35.9  71.4  214  0.43

Note:

1. The 2024 Red Mountain MRE was estimated and classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) “Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines” dated November 29, 2019, and the CIM “Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” dated May 10, 2014.
2. Mr. Warren Black, M.Sc., P.Geo. of APEX Geoscience Ltd., a QP as defined by NI 43-101, is responsible for completing the 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate, effective January 12, 2024.
3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have not demonstrated economic viability. No mineral reserves have been calculated for Red Mountain. There is no guarantee that any part of the mineral resources discussed herein will be converted to a mineral reserve in the future.
4. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, market, or other relevant factors.
5. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources is uncertain, and there has not been sufficient work to define the Inferred Mineral Resource as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource. It is reasonably expected that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
6. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Reported grades are undiluted.
7. A standard density of 2.94 g/cm³ is assumed for mineralized material and waste rock. Overburden density is set at 1.8 g/cm³. For mineralized material blocks with iron assays close enough to estimate an iron value for the block, density is calculated using the formula: density (g/cm³) = 0.0553 * Fe (%) + 2.5426.
8. Metal prices are US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag.
9. Recoveries are 90% Zn, 75% Pb, 70% Cu, 70% Ag, and 80% Au.
10. ZnEQ (%) = [Zn (%) x 1] + [Pb (%) x 0.6364] + [Cu (%) x 2.4889] + [Ag (ppm) x 0.0209] + [Au (ppm) x 0.1923]
11. AgEQ (ppm) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (ppm) x 1] + [Au (ppm) x 91.93]
12. Open-pit resource economic assumptions are US$3/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material, US$19/tonne for processing, and 48° pit slopes.
13. Underground resource economic assumptions are US$50/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material and US$19/tonne for processing.
14. Open-pit resources comprise blocks constrained by the pit shell resulting from the pseudoflow optimization using the open-pit economic assumptions.
15. Underground resources comprise blocks below the open-pit shell that form minable shapes. They must be contained in domains of a minimum width of 1.5 m at Dry Creek or 3 m height at West Tundra Flats. Resources not meeting these size criteria are included if, once diluted to the required size, maintain a grade above the cutoff.

 

 

RedMountain-highlights-map

Exploration and Development Strategy

Silver47 is focused on exploration to expand the current resource base and uncover new high-grade zones. The strategy includes:

Rapid Resource Growth

Focused on the Dry Creek and West Tundra Flats (WTF) zones.

Targeting New Discoveries

Drilling to identify new silver-copper-gold mineralization.

Advancing Towards Development

Fast-tracking the project to a development milestone and potential mine build.

Historical Exploration

The project area has a rich history of mineral exploration, with the first sulphide outcrop discovered in 1975. Ongoing exploration efforts continue to reveal the potential for further resource expansion, particularly in the Dry Creek and WTF zones.

Drilling Highlights

Dry Creek Zone

  • DC18-79: 6.0m @ 409 g/t Ag, 5.38 g/t Au, 1.21% Cu, 23.3% Zn+Pb (2,155 g/t AgEq*)
  • DC18-77: 5.0m @ 1,213 g/t Ag, 1.87 g/t Au, 0.4% Cu, 6.0% Zn+Pb (1,719 g/t AgEq*)

West Tundra Flats Zone

Multiple high-grade drill intercepts including WTF82-08: 7.3m @ 334.8 g/t Ag, 0.54 g/t Au, 0.07% Cu, 5.42% Pb+Zn (619 g/t AgEq*)

  • Equivalencies are calculated using ratios with metal prices of US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag and recoveries of 90% Zn, 75% Pb, 70% Cu, 70% Ag, and 80% Au.
  • AgEq* (g/t) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (g/t) x 1] + [Au (g/t) x 91.93]
img2

GALLERY

DryCreek

dry creek core 2024 layered siltsone mineralization
dry creek core 2024 layered siltsone mineralization
dry creek drilling 2024
dry creek drilling 2024
dry creek massive sulphide 2024
dry creek massive sulphide 2024

Horseshoe Prospect

horseshoe prospect - 1
horseshoe prospect - 1
horseshoe prospect - 2
horseshoe prospect - 2
horseshoe prospect - 3
horseshoe prospect - 3
horseshoe prospect - 4
horseshoe prospect - 4
horseshoe prospect - 5
horseshoe prospect - 5
horseshoe prospect - 6
horseshoe prospect - 6
horseshoe prospect - 7
horseshoe prospect - 7
horseshoe prospect - 8
horseshoe prospect - 8
horseshoe prospect - 9
horseshoe prospect - 9

Other Prospects

galleon prospect 2024
galleon prospect 2024
kiwi prospect 2024 - 1
kiwi prospect 2024 - 1
kiwi prospect 2024 - 2
kiwi prospect 2024 - 2
other prospect -1
other prospect -1
other prospect -2
other prospect -2
west tundra flats 2024 - 1
west tundra flats 2024 - 1
west tundra flats 2024 - 2
west tundra flats 2024 - 2
wtf core massive sulphide - 1
wtf core massive sulphide - 1
wtf core massive sulphide - 2
wtf core massive sulphide - 2
wtf core massive sulphide - 3
wtf core massive sulphide - 3
Play Slideshow Pause Slideshow
 
 
 
 
 
Technical information on this page has been approved by Silver47 Exploration’s Vice President Exploration, Alex S. Wallis, P.Geo, a ‘Qualified Person’ as defined under Canadian National Instrument 43-101. Full disclosure is available on Silver47’s cautionary statements page
silver47-logo

Phone: +1-403-870-1166

Email: info@silver47.ca

  • Corporate
  • Projects
  • Investors
  • News
  • Contact
  • Sign Up

Copyright © 2024 - Silver47 | Website by Sandman Media